"They deliver your food, drive your ride, and power your apps — but who protects their rights?"
Gig workers are individuals who perform short‑term, flexible, task‑based or project‑based work outside traditional employer–employee relationships. They are paid per task, delivery, ride, shift, or milestone, often through digital platforms or informal market arrangements. The model offers flexibility and low barriers to entry but typically lacks fixed salaries, paid leave, or long‑term security. Income varies with demand, ratings, and algorithmic allocation of work. While gig work creates opportunities for new earners and migrants, it also shifts business risks—like fuel, equipment, and downtime—onto workers. As the sector grows across mobility, delivery, home services, and freelance digital work, the need for clear protections becomes urgent.
Gig work spans platform‑based and non‑platform roles. Platform workers use apps and marketplaces—such as ride‑hailing, food delivery, e‑commerce logistics, and home‑service platforms—or online freelancing portals for design, coding, content, and data tasks. Their workflow, payouts, and ratings are mediated by algorithms and in‑app policies. Non‑platform gig workers operate through offline networks and contractors in construction, events, housekeeping, agriculture support, and seasonal labour. Both categories share informality, variable hours, and fragmented employer accountability, but platform workers face additional challenges of opaque pricing, dynamic incentives, and automated penalties. Understanding these distinctions helps tailor welfare schemes, grievance redress, and registration pathways for each segment.
According to NITI Aayog (2022), India hosted around 7.7 million gig workers in 2020–21, projected to reach 23.5 million by 2029–30—roughly 6.7% of the non‑agricultural workforce. The broader gig and platform economy contributes meaningfully to GDP by enabling e‑commerce, logistics, and digital services, with estimates placing sector value in the hundreds of billions of dollars. Rapid smartphone adoption, UPI payments, and urban consumption have accelerated demand. However, growth also exposes gaps in social insurance coverage, dispute resolution, and safety nets for income shocks. Policy responses must therefore scale alongside the workforce, ensuring inclusion of women, migrants, and workers from smaller towns.
Gig work in India is predominantly urban and youth‑led, with a large share of workers under 40. Men are concentrated in mobility and delivery, while women are more represented in beauty, care, and home services—often balancing unpaid care work with flexible shifts. Many workers are first‑generation migrants seeking quick entry into city labour markets, while a growing cohort of educated freelancers participate in digital projects. Barriers like smartphone access, digital literacy, and safety concerns can exclude some groups. Understanding these demographic patterns is key to designing targeted skilling, safety, and social‑security measures that reflect lived realities across cities and towns.
Despite powering everyday services, gig workers often lack social security, paid leave, and accident insurance. Income can be volatile due to seasonal demand, surge pricing, or sudden account deactivations. Opaque algorithms determine access to orders, fares, and incentives, making earnings unpredictable and disputes hard to contest. Health and safety risks—accidents, heat, and long hours—frequently go uncompensated. With platforms treating workers as independent contractors, statutory benefits may not apply uniformly. Legal and policy frameworks are needed to ensure minimum protections, transparent payouts, grievance redress, and portability of benefits across platforms so that flexibility does not come at the cost of basic security.
Nationally, the Code on Social Security, 2020 recognises gig and platform workers and empowers schemes for health, maternity, disability, and old‑age support, funded partly by platform contributions and worker registration via e‑Shram. Implementation, however, is phased and incomplete. Rajasthan’s 2023 Platform‑Based Gig Workers Act creates a welfare board, mandates registration, enables a cess on platforms up to 2% of turnover, and calls for transparency in algorithms and pay structures. Other states are piloting insurance, skills, and grievance systems. Related labour laws may apply in limited contexts. Together, these measures form an emerging scaffold, but full protection depends on timely rules and interoperable systems.
Implementation of social‑security codes has been slow, leaving many workers without practical coverage. Non‑platform gig workers are harder to enumerate and often fall outside platform‑linked schemes. Platforms may resist higher contributions, while workers face hurdles in registration, KYC, and claim processing. Benefit levels are modest, with limited provisions for paid leave, minimum earnings, or sick pay. Rural and small‑town gig workers receive less policy attention, despite rising deliveries beyond metros. Clear rules on deactivation, dispute resolution, and data transparency remain nascent. Bridging these gaps requires coordinated state–centre action, worker representation, and portable entitlements that follow workers across apps.
Courts and policymakers have nudged reforms: the Supreme Court has urged swifter implementation of social‑security codes, while High Court rulings have clarified that gig workers are not employees under certain statutes like EPF, underscoring the need for bespoke protections. NITI Aayog has recommended standard contracts, easier credit, and skilling support. Union and state budgets increasingly earmark funds for e‑Shram expansion, health cover pilots, and welfare boards. Yet the regulatory picture remains evolving, with varied state capacity and platform compliance. Building credible, data‑driven systems for registration, benefits, and grievances is central to durable progress.
Workers and researchers can consult official portals for the latest rules and schemes. The Ministry of Labour sites host updates on the Code on Social Security and draft rules, while state government pages carry notifications for welfare boards and registration drives. The e‑Shram portal enables worker registration and provides a unified ID for portability of benefits. RTI applications can obtain scheme guidelines, cess collections, or grievance statistics to assess delivery. Because policies evolve, checking authoritative sources periodically ensures accurate information. Civil society advisories, helplines, and unions can also guide workers through enrollment and dispute processes.
Public discussion reflects both hope and caution. Supporters view state‑level welfare boards and mandated platform contributions as vital steps toward dignity and safety. Many workers report gains from insurance pilots and clearer grievance channels. Platforms warn of compliance costs and operational complexity, arguing for phased rollouts. Observers emphasise transparency in algorithms, predictable payouts, and non‑arbitrary deactivations to sustain trust. The broader consensus favours building a floor of security without stifling innovation, with evidence‑based adjustments as data from registrations, benefits, and disputes accumulates over time.
Register on e‑Shram or state portals to obtain a worker ID and access eligible schemes. Keep KYC and bank details updated to avoid payment failures. Read in‑app policies and maintain records of trips, deliveries, and payouts for dispute resolution. Use RTI to request welfare‑board rules, cess utilisation, or complaint outcomes when information is unclear. Participate in local meetings, helplines, or unions to raise concerns collectively and learn about insurance, safety, and grievance mechanisms. As benefits become portable, ensure your registration follows you across platforms so coverage continues when switching apps or cities.
Gig work has emerged as a major source of livelihood for millions of workers across India, especially in sectors like food delivery, cab services, and online platforms. However, gig workers often lack social security, minimum wages, and welfare benefits. To address these challenges, some states have introduced specific legislations. Rajasthan became the first state to pass the Rajasthan Platform Based Gig Workers (Registration and Welfare) Act, 2023. This Act creates a welfare board, ensures registration of gig workers, and introduces a dedicated social security fund. Similarly, Karnataka has drafted a bill focusing on fair wages, insurance, and welfare measures for platform-based workers. Telangana too has considered legal measures to strengthen rights and protections for gig and platform workers. These state-level initiatives are important milestones in recognizing gig workers as part of the formal workforce and ensuring dignity, fairness, and social security in the evolving economy.
The gig economy connects millions of workers to income and consumers to convenient services, but its promise must be matched with protections. India’s evolving framework—combining national codes, state welfare boards, registration, and platform contributions—can deliver a baseline of security if implemented well. Clear rules on deactivation, transparent payouts, safety nets for injuries and illness, and portable benefits are essential to fairness. With workers, platforms, and governments collaborating, India can build a model that preserves flexibility while safeguarding dignity, enabling the sector to grow on a foundation of rights, accountability, and shared prosperity.